If you filed Form 67 late and CPC wiped out your foreign tax credit, you may still get it back. On 17 August 2026, ITAT Bangalore ruled in Shashank Shekhar v. ITO that a late Form 67 cannot, by itself, defeat a foreign tax credit (FTC) claim under section 90 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and Article 25 of the India-USA DTAA.
We see this every filing season. Someone works a stint in the US, pays American tax on their salary, comes back to India as a resident and reports the income honestly. Then the CPC intimation lands with the credit removed, just because Form 67 wasn't uploaded before the return.
This guide walks through what the Tribunal decided, why, and what to do if your Foreign Tax Credit in India was denied.
ITAT Bangalore held that a mere delay in filing Form 67 under Rule 128(9) does not take away a resident taxpayer's right to foreign tax credit. It told the Assessing Officer (AO) to accept Form 67 and decide the claim on merits.
Here's how the case played out. The order came from Bench C, with Vice President Prashant Maharishi and Judicial Member Sandeep Singh Karhail, for assessment year 2017-18. The taxpayer, a resident individual, paid ₹1,79,971 in US tax on US income of ₹8,98,392 and claimed FTC of ₹1,64,427 in India. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, so the AO now verifies the numbers, with the procedural objection gone.
| Particular | Detail |
|---|---|
| Case name | Shashank Shekhar v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 5, Bangalore |
| Appeal number | ITA 2613/Bang/2025 |
| Assessment year | 2017-18 |
| Forum | ITAT Bangalore, Bench C |
| Members | Prashant Maharishi (VP); Sandeep Singh Karhail (JM) |
| Date of order | 17 August 2026 |
| Foreign income | ₹8,98,392 (USA) |
| Foreign tax paid | ₹1,79,971 |
| FTC claimed | ₹1,64,427 |
| Law | Section 90, Income-tax Act, 1961; Rule 128(9), Income-tax Rules, 1962; Article 25, India-USA DTAA |
| Result | Allowed for statistical purposes; sent back to AO to allow FTC on merits |
Form 67 is the statement of foreign income and foreign tax credit that a resident files on the Indian income tax portal to claim credit for tax paid abroad under Rule 128 of the Income-tax Rules, 1962.
Why does it exist? An Indian resident is taxed on worldwide income. If another country has already taxed that income, sections 90 and 91 give you a credit so you aren't taxed twice. Form 67 is how you claim it. It lists the foreign income, the country, the tax paid and the relief claimed. You back it up with a certificate or statement of foreign tax, such as a US Form W-2 or Form 1040.
The catch is that CPC's software only checks whether Form 67 exists when it processes the return. If it doesn't, the credit is removed in the section 143(1) intimation, even if the tax was genuinely paid. That's the usual story behind Foreign Tax Credit denied by CPC.
CPC denied the FTC twice, the first appeal was dismissed for delay, and the Tribunal ruled seven years after the original denial.
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| Original return (AY 2017-18) | US income offered to tax in India; FTC of ₹1,64,427 claimed without Form 67 |
| 06 March 2019 | CPC processes the return under section 143(1) and denies FTC |
| 18 March 2019 | Taxpayer files Form 67 |
| 22 March 2019 | Taxpayer files a revised return claiming FTC |
| 12 April 2019 | CPC processes the revised return and denies FTC again, though Form 67 is on record |
| 21 October 2025 | Addl./Joint CIT(A), Chennai dismisses the appeal for delay without deciding the merits |
| 17 August 2026 | ITAT Bangalore holds that delay in Form 67 cannot defeat FTC and sends the matter back |
The taxpayer didn't even appear before the Tribunal. He won on the strength of the paper book, which had Form 67 and Form W-2, plus a steady line of earlier rulings.
Rule 128(9) sets a deadline but no consequence for missing it, the Act itself sets no deadline, and a procedural rule can't override a right given by section 90 and the treaty. Let's take the reasons one at a time.
For AY 2017-18, Rule 128(9) asked for Form 67 by the section 139(1) due date. It said nothing about losing the credit if you were late. When a procedural rule attaches no penalty to non-compliance, courts treat it as directory. Rule 128(4) lists the cases where FTC is truly not allowed, and late Form 67 isn't one of them.
Your right to relief comes from the Act and the DTAA. Neither section 90 nor section 91 says the declaration must be filed by the return due date.
The Income-tax (Twenty-seventh Amendment) Rules, 2022 replaced Rule 128(9) from 1 April 2022 and allowed Form 67 up to the end of the assessment year. Following ITAT Mumbai in Sonakshi Sinha v. CIT [2022] 142 taxmann.com 414, the Tribunal read this as a sign that the older deadline shouldn't be fatal.
Revenue often leans on the Supreme Court's Wipro Ltd. ruling, which treated a time-bound declaration as mandatory. The Tribunal agreed with Sonakshi Sinha that Wipro dealt with a condition in the Act itself. The Form 67 deadline sits only in a rule, with no stated consequence. The Supreme Court's approach in CIT v. G.M. Knitting Industries (P) Ltd., where a form filed during assessment counted as sufficient compliance, also backs the taxpayer.
It means the Tribunal accepted the taxpayer's legal argument but didn't work out the relief itself. The denial was set aside, and the AO must accept Form 67 and the supporting papers, hear the taxpayer and decide the FTC on merits. The procedural objection is gone, but the amount still needs checking.
At least one High Court and several ITAT benches have held that FTC can't be denied just because Form 67 was filed late. Here are the main ones.
| Ruling | Forum | Held |
|---|---|---|
| Venkatanarayanan Somayaji Lakshminarasimha v. PCIT [2025] 174 taxmann.com 754 | Madras High Court | Late Form 67 is a procedural lapse; FTC can't be denied |
| Shashank Shekhar v. ITO, ITA 2613/Bang/2025 (17.08.2026) | ITAT Bangalore | Form 67 filed before revised return was processed; FTC to be allowed on merits |
| Sonakshi Sinha v. CIT [2022] 142 taxmann.com 414 | ITAT Mumbai | Form 67 filed before assessment is complete is sufficient; Wipro distinguished |
| 42 Hertz Software India (P) Ltd v. ACIT [2022] 139 taxmann.com 448 | ITAT Bangalore | Rule 128(9) is directory |
| Brinda Rama Krishna v. ITO [2022] 135 taxmann.com 358 | ITAT Bangalore | Rule 128(9) is directory; no disallowance prescribed |
| Vinodkumar Lakshmipathi v. CIT(A), ITA 680/Bang/2022 | ITAT Bangalore | Same view by a division bench |
Foreign tax credit is the lower of the foreign tax you paid and the Indian tax payable on that same foreign income, worked out separately for each income source and each country.
That's why Shashank Shekhar claimed ₹1,64,427 even though he paid ₹1,79,971 in the US. The extra foreign tax is simply lost. India doesn't refund it or let you carry it forward. Here's an example with round numbers:
| Item (illustrative) | Amount |
|---|---|
| US salary offered to tax in India | ₹10,00,000 |
| US federal and state tax paid (in INR) | ₹2,00,000 |
| Indian tax on that income | ₹1,50,000 |
| Foreign tax credit allowed (lower of the two) | ₹1,50,000 |
| Excess foreign tax not creditable | ₹50,000 |
Two more rules to remember. Foreign tax is converted at the SBI telegraphic transfer buying rate on the last day of the month before the month the tax was paid or deducted. And foreign interest, fees or penalties never qualify for credit.
If CPC removed your FTC because Form 67 was missing, follow these steps. They're the same ones we use with clients.
Most denials come from a few avoidable slips. Watch out for these:
For income earned from 1 April 2026, Form 67 is replaced by Form 44 under Rule 76 of the Income-tax Rules, 2026, framed under the Income-tax Act, 2025. Form 67 still applies to income up to FY 2025-26.
Here's the side-by-side view for Form 67 vs Form 44 FY 2026-27.
| Feature | Form 67 | Form 44 |
|---|---|---|
| Governing law | Income-tax Act, 1961; Rule 128, Income-tax Rules, 1962 | Income-tax Act, 2025; Rule 76, Income-tax Rules, 2026 |
| Applies to | Income up to FY 2025-26 (AY 2026-27 and earlier), even if filed after 1 April 2026 | Income from tax year 2026-27 onwards |
| Disputed foreign tax | Handled within Form 67 | Separate Form 45 on settlement of dispute |
| Disclosure | Foreign TIN where available | Tighter disclosure, including mandatory foreign TIN and CA verification for larger claims |
Nobody knows yet. The Tribunal built its reasoning on the wording of the old Rule 128(9). Until a tribunal or court interprets Rule 76, treat the Form 44 deadline as binding and file it before your return.
Dinesh Aarjav & Associates prepares Form 67 and Form 44, computes FTC under the relevant DTAA, aligns your Indian ITR with your US Form 1040 and Form 1116, and handles rectifications and appeals where CPC has denied credit. If you have an FTC stuck in an old intimation, it's often still recoverable.
Talk to our cross-border tax team: explore our DTAA Advisory, US Tax Returns for NRIs and Returning to India services, or book a consultation at dineshaarjav.com.
*Disclaimer: This article is for general information and reflects the ITAT order pronounced on 17 August 2026. It is not legal or tax advice. Please consult a qualified professional before acting on it.*
Stay in the loop, subscribe to our newsletter and unlock a world of exclusive updates, insights, and offers delivered straight to your inbox.